GPT-5.6 Luna API Pricing: OpenAI's Cheapest 1M+ Context Model at $0.20/M
GPT-5.6 Luna offers 1.05M context at just $0.20/M input — 80% cheaper than its original price, and OpenAI's most affordable model for long-document tasks.
TL;DR
- Price: $0.20/M input, $1.20/M output — 80% price cut from original $1.00/$6.00
- Context: 1.05M tokens — same window as GPT-5.6 Sol ($5.00/$30.00)
- Vision: Yes — supports image input alongside text
- Provider: OpenAI API (platform.openai.com)
- Best for: Long-document analysis, RAG pipelines, bulk processing, codebase understanding
- Trade-off: Less capable reasoning than GPT-5.6 Terra or Sol — best for volume over complexity
GPT-5.6 Luna Pricing Breakdown
At $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens, Luna is 12.5x cheaper on input than GPT-5.4 ($2.50/M) while offering 2.6x more context. Here's how the costs scale:
| Monthly Volume | Input Cost | Output Cost | Total Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M tokens | $0.20 | $1.20 | $1.40 |
| 10M tokens | $2.00 | $12.00 | $14.00 |
| 100M tokens | $20.00 | $120.00 | $140.00 |
| 1B tokens | $200.00 | $1,200.00 | $1,400.00 |
At 100M tokens/month, GPT-5.6 Luna costs $140. The same volume on GPT-5.6 Terra would cost $1,100, and on GPT-5.6 Sol it would cost $2,750.
GPT-5.6 Family: Sol vs Terra vs Luna
The GPT-5.6 family shares the same 1.05M context window but differs in capability and cost:
| Model | Input $/M | Output $/M | Context | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 Luna | $0.20 | $1.20 | 1.05M | Volume tasks, RAG, bulk processing |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | $2.00 | $12.00 | 1.05M | Complex analysis, coding, agentic workflows |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | $5.00 | $30.00 | 1.05M | Flagship reasoning, research, nuanced writing |
Luna is 10x cheaper than Terra and 25x cheaper than Sol. If your task doesn't need top-tier reasoning, Luna delivers the same 1M+ context at a fraction of the cost.
How GPT-5.6 Luna Compares to Other Budget Models
| Model | Input $/M | Output $/M | Context | Vision | Provider |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | $0.03 | $0.13 | 1M | ✅ | Alibaba |
| GPT-5 nano | $0.05 | $0.40 | 128K | ❌ | OpenAI |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | $0.10 | $0.40 | 1M | ✅ | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | $0.14 | $0.28 | 1M | ❌ | DeepSeek |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | $0.20 | $1.20 | 1.05M | ✅ | OpenAI |
| GPT-5.4 nano | $0.20 | $1.25 | 400K | ❌ | OpenAI |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | $0.25 | $1.50 | 1M | ✅ |
Among OpenAI models, Luna offers the best value for large-context workloads. Qwen 3.7 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Flash are cheaper per token, but Luna runs on OpenAI's infrastructure with guaranteed SLA, function calling, and structured outputs.
GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5 nano: Which Budget OpenAI Model?
Both are OpenAI budget models, but they serve different use cases:
| Feature | GPT-5.6 Luna | GPT-5 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.20/M | $0.05/M |
| Output price | $1.20/M | $0.40/M |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Vision | ✅ | ❌ |
| Model family | GPT-5.6 (newest) | GPT-5 (legacy) |
| Best for | Long docs, RAG, bulk processing | Simple classification, extraction |
Rule of thumb: Use GPT-5 nano for simple, high-volume tasks where context fits in 128K. Use GPT-5.6 Luna when you need 1M+ context, vision, or the improved GPT-5.6 architecture.
When to Use GPT-5.6 Luna
📄 Long-Document Analysis
Process entire codebases, legal contracts, or research papers in a single call. 1.05M context handles documents that smaller models can't fit.
🔍 RAG Pipelines
Feed large retrieval contexts directly into Luna without aggressive chunking. Cheaper per-token than Terra for retrieval-augmented generation.
📊 Bulk Data Processing
Classification, extraction, and transformation at scale. Luna's low per-token cost makes high-volume processing affordable.
🖼️ Vision Tasks
Image understanding, document OCR, and visual Q&A. Luna supports image input — unlike GPT-5 nano or GPT-5.4 nano.
💻 Codebase Understanding
Load entire repositories into context for code review, documentation generation, or migration planning. 1.05M tokens fits most projects.
🤖 Background Agents
Cost-effective backbone for agentic workflows that need large context but not flagship reasoning. Save Sol/Terra for the hard parts.
Real-World Cost: Processing 10,000 Documents/Month
Suppose you're building a document analysis pipeline that processes 10,000 documents per month, averaging 5,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens per document:
| Model | Input Cost | Output Cost | Monthly Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 Luna | $10.00 | $12.00 | $22.00 |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | $100.00 | $120.00 | $220.00 |
| GPT-5.4 | $125.00 | $150.00 | $275.00 |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | $250.00 | $300.00 | $550.00 |
Luna processes the same workload for $22/month — 10x cheaper than Terra and 12.5x cheaper than Sol. For bulk document tasks, the savings compound fast.
Compare 93 AI Models Side by Side
GPT-5.6 Luna is one of 93 models tracked on APIpulse. Compare pricing, context windows, and features across 11 providers.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Pages
- GPT-5 nano Pricing Guide — OpenAI's cheapest model overall
- GPT-5.6 Pricing Guide — Full GPT-5.6 family comparison (Sol, Terra, Luna)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash Pricing — The cheapest AI model at $0.03/$0.13
- Top 10 Cheapest LLM APIs — Ranked by input price
- OpenAI Provider Page — All 31 OpenAI models compared