Budget Tier

GPT-5 mini vs Llama 4 Scout

Closed-source vs open-source at budget prices. Llama 4 Scout is cheaper across the board and offers 3.7x larger context — but GPT-5 mini may deliver better quality on complex tasks.

Pricing data verified: Jun 6, 2026

SpecificationGPT-5 mini (OpenAI)Llama 4 Scout (Meta/Together.ai)
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.25$0.18
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$0.59
Context Window272K tokens1M tokens
TierBudgetBudget
ProviderOpenAI (closed-source)Meta / Together.ai (open-source, Apache 2.0)
Self-HostableNoYes

Calculate Your Exact Costs

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on paper — see how much you'd save at your actual usage.

OpenAI
GPT-5 mini
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month
Meta / Together.ai
Llama 4 Scout
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month

Other Budget-Tier Models

DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek
$0.14 / $0.28 per 1M
1M context
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Google
$0.075 / $0.30 per 1M
1M context
GPT-oss 20B
OpenAI
$0.08 / $0.35 per 1M
128K context

Which Model for Which Use Case?

Chatbots & Customer Support

Llama 4 Scout's 1M context handles long conversations without losing track. Its 70% cheaper output pricing makes it ideal for high-volume chat.

Better value: Llama 4 Scout

Code Generation

GPT-5 mini's training on code and OpenAI's fine-tuning give it an edge on complex coding tasks. Llama 4 Scout handles simple code well but struggles with intricate logic.

Better value: GPT-5 mini

RAG Pipelines

Both support large context windows, but Llama 4 Scout's 1M context (3.7x larger) handles massive document sets at 70% lower output cost.

Better value: Llama 4 Scout

Data Extraction & Classification

Input-heavy tasks with short outputs. Llama 4 Scout's 28% cheaper input and lower output costs make it the budget winner for classification at scale.

Better value: Llama 4 Scout

Optimizing a budget AI stack?

APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 34 models, find the cheapest option for your exact usage, and save scenarios for your team.

34 models across 10 providers
Save up to 10 scenarios
Export PDF cost reports
Optimize — save up to 40%
Get Pro — $29 one-time

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than GPT-5 mini?

Yes, on both input and output. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.18/M input (28% cheaper) and $0.59/M output (70% cheaper). It also has a 1M token context window — 3.7x larger than GPT-5 mini's 272K.

Is GPT-5 mini better quality than Llama 4 Scout?

GPT-5 mini generally performs better on complex reasoning, coding, and instruction-following tasks. Llama 4 Scout is strong for its price but may lag on nuanced tasks. For high-stakes applications, GPT-5 mini may justify its premium.

Can I self-host Llama 4 Scout?

Yes, Llama 4 Scout is open-source under Apache 2.0. You can self-host it for zero per-token costs, but you'll need GPU resources (approximately 1x H100 80GB or equivalent). Use Together.ai for managed hosting without infrastructure overhead.

When should I choose GPT-5 mini over Llama 4 Scout?

Choose GPT-5 mini when quality and reliability are critical — complex reasoning, code generation, or tasks where mistakes are costly. Choose Llama 4 Scout when you need maximum context (1M), lowest cost, or want to self-host for zero per-token costs.

Related Comparisons

GPT-oss vs Llama 4
Open-source budget face-off
GPT-5 mini vs Gemini Flash
Budget cross-provider
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini Flash Lite
Ultra-budget showdown
Share on X LinkedIn