OpenAI
GPT-5.5
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month

Other Models to Consider

GPT-5
OpenAI
$1.25 / $10 per 1M
272K context
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$2 / $12 per 1M
1M context
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$5 / $25 per 1M
1M context

Which Model for Which Use Case?

SaaS Chatbot

Customer-facing chatbot for your product. High volume, cost-sensitive. Sonnet 4.6's 40-50% cheaper pricing makes a huge difference at scale.

Better value: Claude Sonnet 4.6

Complex Reasoning Tasks

Advanced research, multi-step analysis, strategic planning. GPT-5.5's premium reasoning capabilities may justify the extra cost.

Premium quality: GPT-5.5 | Cost-effective: Sonnet 4.6

Code Assistant

AI-powered coding help, code review, refactoring. Both models are strong. Sonnet 4.6 offers better cost per request for high-volume use.

Better value: Claude Sonnet 4.6

Enterprise AI Assistant

High-stakes enterprise deployments requiring maximum quality. GPT-5.5's premium capabilities may justify the 2x cost premium for critical tasks.

Premium quality: GPT-5.5 | Cost-effective: Sonnet 4.6

Building on a budget?

APIpulse lets you compare all 87 models, save scenarios, and find the cheapest option for your exact usage pattern.

87 models across 10 providers
Save up to 10 scenarios
Export PDF cost reports
Optimize — save up to 40%
Free Tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 cheaper than GPT-5.5?

Yes, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is significantly cheaper. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/M input and $15/M output, while GPT-5.5 costs $5/M input and $30/M output. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 40% cheaper on input tokens and 50% cheaper on output tokens.

Which has a larger context window?

Both models have similar context windows. GPT-5.5 has 1.05M tokens while Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 1M tokens. GPT-5.5 has a slight 5% advantage, but for most practical purposes, both handle extremely long documents.

When should I choose GPT-5.5 over Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Choose GPT-5.5 when you need: (1) Maximum reasoning capability for complex tasks, (2) Slightly larger context (1.05M vs 1M), (3) OpenAI's specific training advantages. For most cost-sensitive workloads, Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers better value per dollar.

Can I mix GPT-5.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 to optimize costs?

Yes. Use Claude Sonnet 4.6 for most requests (40-50% cheaper) and route the most complex reasoning tasks to GPT-5.5. This multi-model strategy can save 30-40% vs using GPT-5.5 for everything.

📊 Live Pricing

Real-time prices for all 87 models

💰 Pricing Hub

All 87 models compared — find the cheapest

Related Comparisons

5 Cheaper Claude Alternatives →
Save 60-98% on API costs
5 Cheaper GPT-5 Alternatives →
Save 60-97% on API costs
Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5
Premium tier reverse comparison
GPT-5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Premium vs premium
GPT-5 vs Claude Opus 4.8
Mid-tier vs premium
Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5
Anthropic mid vs OpenAI premium

Related Tools

Migration Checklist →
Switch providers in 5 steps
Free Pricing Widget
Embed live AI pricing on your site
Share on X LinkedIn

All Tools Are Free

No signup required to 67-model comparison, migration code snippets, PDF reports, price alerts, and cost monitoring. ✅ All tools free.

Free Tools →
This was a snapshot. What about next month?
Prices change. New models launch. Our tools catch what a one-time calculation can't — and saves you money every month.
Free Tools → 🔍 Free audit first