Budget vs Budget

GPT-5 mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5

OpenAI's budget model against Anthropic's lightweight. GPT-5 mini is 75% cheaper on input and 60% cheaper on output — but Haiku offers Anthropic's superior instruction following. See which fits your workload.

Pricing data verified: 2026-06-20

SpecificationGPT-5 mini (OpenAI)Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic)
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.25$1.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$5.00
Context Window272K200K
TierBudgetBudget
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic

Calculate Your Exact Costs

See how the costs stack up for your specific usage pattern.

OpenAI
GPT-5 mini
Cheaper Choice
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month

Other Models to Consider

Mistral Small 4
Mistral
$0.10 / $0.30 per 1M
128K context
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek
$0.435 / $0.87 per 1M
1M context
Gemini 3 Flash
Google
$0.50 / $3.00 per 1M
1M context

Which Model for Which Use Case?

Cost-Sensitive High Volume

GPT-5 mini's $0.25/M input and $2.00/M output make it significantly cheaper for high-volume tasks. At 1M requests/day, you'd save $225/mo vs Haiku.

Cheapest: GPT-5 mini

Complex Instruction Following

Claude Haiku 4.5 excels at following complex, multi-step instructions. If your prompts are nuanced and require careful adherence, Haiku's training gives it an edge.

Better instructions: Claude Haiku 4.5

OpenAI Ecosystem

If you're already on OpenAI's platform, GPT-5 mini integrates with Assistants API, function calling, and fine-tuning. Switching to Anthropic means rewriting integrations.

Better ecosystem: GPT-5 mini

Safety & Alignment

Anthropic's Constitutional AI approach means Haiku 4.5 is designed with safety and alignment in mind. For applications where output safety matters, Haiku is the safer choice.

Safer outputs: Claude Haiku 4.5

Comparing Budget Models?

APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 42 models, find the cheapest option for your exact usage, and save scenarios for your team.

42 models across 10 providers
Save up to 10 scenarios
Export PDF cost reports
Optimize — save up to 40%
Get Pro — $29 one-time

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-5 mini cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5?

Yes. GPT-5 mini costs $0.25/M input and $2.00/M output — 75% cheaper on input and 60% cheaper on output than Claude Haiku 4.5's $1.00/M input and $5.00/M output.

When would I choose Claude Haiku 4.5 over GPT-5 mini?

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if you need Anthropic's superior instruction following, better at following complex prompts, or prefer Anthropic's API ecosystem. Haiku also has 200K context vs GPT-5 mini's 272K.

Which model has a better context window?

GPT-5 mini has a 272K token context window — 36% larger than Claude Haiku 4.5's 200K. For longer documents or extended conversations, GPT-5 mini handles more context.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 worth the premium over GPT-5 mini?

For many tasks, GPT-5 mini offers better value at 60-75% lower cost. Claude Haiku 4.5 may be worth the premium for tasks requiring Anthropic's specific instruction-following capabilities or when you're already invested in the Anthropic ecosystem.

Related Comparisons

5 Cheaper Claude Alternatives →
Save 40-98% on API costs
Sonnet 4.6 vs Haiku 4.5
Same provider, different tier
Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Small 4
Budget battle
GPT-5 mini vs Mistral Small 4
Budget vs budget
Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Budget showdown
Share on X LinkedIn