Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout
Open-source vs closed — Llama 4 Scout is 82% cheaper on input tokens and has 2.5x the context window. The ultimate budget showdown.
Pricing data verified: Jun 10, 2026
| Specification | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $1.00 | $0.18 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $5.00 | $0.59 |
| Context Window | 200K tokens | 512K tokens |
| Tier | Budget | Budget |
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta (via Together.ai) |
| Input Savings | Baseline | 82% cheaper |
| Output Savings | Baseline | 88% cheaper |
| Cost at 1M input + 500K output | $3.50 | $0.48 |
Calculate Your Exact Costs
Enter your usage to see a precise cost comparison for both models.
Which Model for Which Use Case?
Ultra-Budget Workloads
Llama 4 Scout is 82-88% cheaper across the board — ideal for high-volume, cost-sensitive applications where every fraction of a cent matters. At $0.18/M input, it's one of the cheapest production-ready models available.
Managed API with SLA
Claude Haiku 4.5 comes with Anthropic's managed infrastructure, SLA guarantees, and enterprise support. For production systems that need reliability guarantees and don't want to manage provider dependencies, Haiku is the safer choice.
Long-Document Processing
Llama 4 Scout's 512K context is 2.5x larger than Haiku's 200K. For processing lengthy documents, maintaining large conversation histories, or handling complex RAG pipelines, Scout gives you significantly more room.
Instruction Following & Safety
Claude Haiku 4.5 inherits Anthropic's strong emphasis on instruction following, alignment, and safety. For applications requiring precise adherence to complex prompts and guardrails, Haiku delivers more reliable results.
Need deeper cost analysis?
APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 39 models, save scenarios, and export PDF reports.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5?
Yes, significantly. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.18/M input and $0.59/M output via providers like Together.ai. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00/M input and $5.00/M output. Llama 4 Scout is 82% cheaper on input and 88% cheaper on output. For a typical workload of 1M input + 500K output tokens/month, Llama 4 Scout costs $0.48 vs Haiku's $3.50 — saving you $3.03/month (87%).
Which has a larger context window, Haiku 4.5 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout has a 512K token context window, which is 2.5x larger than Claude Haiku 4.5's 200K context. If you need to process longer documents or maintain larger conversation histories, Scout offers more room. For most typical workloads under 200K tokens, both models are equally capable.
When should I choose Claude Haiku 4.5 over Llama 4 Scout?
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when: (1) you want Anthropic's strong instruction following and safety features, (2) you need reliable structured output and classification, (3) you prefer a managed API with SLA guarantees. Choose Llama 4 Scout when: (1) cost is the primary concern (82-88% cheaper), (2) you need a 512K context window, (3) you're comfortable with self-hosting or third-party providers like Together.ai.
Are Claude Haiku 4.5 and Llama 4 Scout good for production use?
Both are production-ready. Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic's budget-tier model optimized for speed and cost efficiency, excelling at instruction following, classification, and structured data extraction. Llama 4 Scout is Meta's latest open-source model, available via providers like Together.ai and Fireworks, offering excellent performance at a fraction of the cost. Both offer low latency suitable for real-time applications.