Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Grok 4.3
Mistral vs xAI — Grok 4.3 is 17% cheaper on input and 67% cheaper on output, with 7.8x more context.
Pricing data verified: Jun 10, 2026
| Specification | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $1.50 | $1.25 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $7.50 | $2.50 |
| Context Window | 128K tokens | 1M tokens |
| Tier | Mid | Mid |
| Provider | Mistral | xAI |
| Input Savings | Baseline | 17% cheaper |
| Output Savings | Baseline | 67% cheaper |
| Cost at 1M input + 500K output | $5.25 | $2.50 |
Calculate Your Exact Costs
Enter your usage to see a precise cost comparison for both models.
Which Model for Which Use Case?
Cost-Sensitive Workloads
Grok 4.3 is 17-67% cheaper across the board. At $1.25/M input and $2.50/M output, it's significantly cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 for high-volume applications.
Long-Context Processing
Grok 4.3's 1M context window is 7.8x larger than Mistral's 128K. For processing lengthy documents or maintaining large conversation histories, Grok gives you significantly more room.
Real-Time Data
Grok 4.3 integrates with xAI's real-time data feeds, giving it access to current information that Mistral cannot match. For applications requiring up-to-the-minute data, Grok has a clear advantage.
Code Generation
Mistral Medium 3.5 is known for strong code generation capabilities. If your primary use case involves writing, reviewing, or explaining code, Mistral's specialized training gives it an edge.
Need deeper cost analysis?
APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 39 models, save scenarios, and export PDF reports.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Grok 4.3 cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Yes. Grok 4.3 costs $1.25/M input and $2.50/M output. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output. Grok is 17% cheaper on input and 67% cheaper on output. For a typical workload of 1M input + 500K output tokens/month, Grok costs $2.50 vs Mistral's $5.25 — saving $2.75/month (52%).
Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Grok 4.3?
Grok 4.3 has a 1M token context window, which is 7.8x larger than Mistral Medium 3.5's 128K context. If you need to process long documents or maintain extensive conversation histories, Grok offers significantly more room at a lower price. For typical workloads under 128K tokens, both models are equally capable.
When should I choose Mistral Medium 3.5 over Grok 4.3?
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when: (1) you need Mistral's ecosystem and code generation strengths, (2) your workload benefits from Mistral's fine-tuning capabilities, (3) you prefer Mistral's European data governance. Choose Grok 4.3 when: (1) cost efficiency matters (17-67% cheaper), (2) you need up to 1M context, (3) you want xAI's real-time data integration.
Are Mistral Medium 3.5 and Grok 4.3 good for production use?
Both are mid-tier models suitable for production. Mistral Medium 3.5 is known for strong code generation and European data governance. Grok 4.3 from xAI offers exceptional value at 17-67% lower cost with a 1M context window and real-time data access. Both handle chatbot, content generation, and enterprise workloads well.