OpenAI
GPT-5.5
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month
Meta (Together.ai)
Llama 4 Scout
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month

Which Model for Which Use Case?

Extreme Cost Optimization

Llama 4 Scout at $0.18/M is 96% cheaper than GPT-5.5. For high-volume applications where cost per token is critical, Llama 4 Scout delivers massive savings.

Best value: Llama 4 Scout (96-98% cheaper)

Maximum Quality

GPT-5.5 is OpenAI's most capable model, offering the highest quality reasoning and generation. For applications where output quality is paramount, GPT-5.5 justifies its premium.

Quality: GPT-5.5 | Budget: Llama 4 Scout

Open-Source at Scale

Llama 4 Scout gives you full open-source control — self-host, fine-tune, and customize. At $0.18/M input, you can run massive workloads for a fraction of GPT-5.5's cost.

Open-source scale: Llama 4 Scout

Enterprise vs Startup

GPT-5.5 suits enterprises needing managed infrastructure and support. Llama 4 Scout suits startups and cost-conscious teams who can manage their own deployment.

Enterprise: GPT-5.5 | Startup: Llama 4 Scout

Need deeper cost analysis?

APIpulse lets you compare all 87 models, save scenarios, and export PDF reports.

87 models across 10 providers
Save up to 10 scenarios
Export PDF cost reports
Optimize — save up to 40%
Free Tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than GPT-5.5?

Yes. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.18/M input and $0.59/M output. GPT-5.5 costs $5.00/M input and $30.00/M output. Llama is 96% cheaper on input and 98% cheaper on output. For 1M input + 500K output tokens/month, Llama costs $0.48 vs GPT-5.5's $20.00 — saving $19.52/month (98%).

Which has a larger context window?

GPT-5.5 has a 1.05M token context window, which is slightly larger than Llama 4 Scout's 1M context. The difference is minimal — both handle very long contexts.

When should I choose GPT-5.5 over Llama 4 Scout?

Choose GPT-5.5 when: (1) you need OpenAI's premium quality and ecosystem, (2) you want managed infrastructure with SLAs, (3) your workload requires the absolute highest reasoning capability. Choose Llama 4 Scout when: (1) cost is the primary concern (96-98% cheaper), (2) you can self-host or use Together.ai, (3) you want open-source flexibility.

Are both models production-ready?

Both support production workloads. GPT-5.5 is OpenAI's most capable model with enterprise support. Llama 4 Scout is Meta's open-source model via Together.ai — dramatically cheaper but requires more infrastructure consideration.

📊 Live Pricing Dashboard
Real-time prices for 87 models
Savings Calculator
Find your cheapest alternatives

Related Comparisons

5 Cheaper GPT-5 Alternatives →
Save 60-97% on API costs
GPT-5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
OpenAI vs DeepSeek
GPT-5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
OpenAI vs Anthropic
GPT-5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
OpenAI vs Google

Related Tools

Migration Checklist →
Switch providers in 5 steps
Free Pricing Widget
Embed live AI pricing on your site
🔌 Free MCP Server →
📋 Full Pricing Dashboard →
🔥 Pricing Heatmap →
Visual cost comparison across 87 models
💰 Reduce API Costs →
7 proven strategies to cut costs 40-98%
Compare all 87 models side by side
Share on X LinkedIn

All Tools Are Free

No signup required to 67-model comparison, migration code snippets, PDF reports, price alerts, and cost monitoring. ✅ All tools free.

Free Tools →
This was a snapshot. What about next month?
Prices change. New models launch. Our tools catch what a one-time calculation can't — and saves you money every month.
Free Tools → 🔍 Free audit first